
|
This blog will serve as a discussion area as well as a picture resource for the empty buildings in the Euclid, Ohio area. Contributors
![]() Some Slim Choices Here I thought Denial was a river in Egypt. A bit of nostalgia and a whole lot of foresight. Own a little piece of that "old mall" Sad News Aren't you guys sweet. Al Green in Euclid?! Some Photos.. and a Video! Leave it to the Google... No bash this year. ![]() VIEW ALL Freestanding Bank One Euclid Square Mall Fazio's & Super Buffet Red Lobster Toys R Us Pizza Hut Wendy's ![]() Sick Malls Ohio Grocery Group DeadMalls.com The Caldor Rainbow The Retailers: Past and Present LiveJournal RSS Feed |
November 4, 2007
The Euclid Mayoral Race. A guest entry.
This is my first text contribution to the deadeuclid blog as a longtime collaborator and factfinder as well as driver and photography apprentice I decided now was the time to let you all hear my voice concerning the current Mayoral debaucle. I received my mail as usual this afternoon and placed in amongst the typical issues of "Gold Clipper" and my last cable television bill were the typical (at least for the last two weeks) campaign ads. One ad showing former Euclid Mayor Tony Sustarsic and the new Euclid Senior Center, the other a bucket of what appears to be straw filled feces with a "Re-Elect Mayor Cervenik" sign poorly photoshopped over it. I was intrigued, to say the least. The back sides of these humble pieces of equally sized paper propaganda intrigued me further. Cervenik's advertisement featured in bold lettering "The Difference is Clear". Gudenas's piece featured most prominently a black and white photo of a rather bothered-looking Bill Cervenik with the text "Don't Stand for the Dirty Tricks". I have a few complaints about both of these pieces of free mailbox literature: 1. Bill Cervenik's advertisement features some honest looking faces and quotes about how he has seemingly single-handedly brought the city out of a longstanding debt, attracted strong businesses and jobs, strengthened our safety forces, and destroyed the eyesores and safety hazards around our city. The ad continues by stating he "Expanded vital senior service programs" and "helped create a vibrant new senior center". The fact of the matter is, and what should be pointed out is WE as Euclid residents paid for that "vibrant new senior center", we as Euclid residents who pay our taxes, are bankrolling our fire and police departments, and that we as Euclid residents are the ones ultimately responsible for our further development. This, however does not a mayoral campaign make. 2. Ed Gudenas's advertisement, besides featuring a nice big bucket of you-know-what on the front, also shows us that he is endorsed by the Euclid Sun Journal. Not the most reputable publication in the cuyahoga county area by any means, the Euclid Sun is owned and operated by a much larger company and after a dealing or two with them in the past it is obvious to me that nobody is actually captain of that ship. Some Endorsement! The next part troubles me the most, paying no mind to the black square of "poo slinging" at our current mayor, the next blurb states Gudenas is "Endorsed by 8 out of 9 Euclid City Council members". EUREKA! This at long last explains part of Euclid's problems. Any candidate that is a current member of Euclid City Council and has the support of that many consider worries me. It also gives a good reason why the city is falling into decline, despite all the flag-waving and hot air ballooning by the candidates. The problem does not fall into the executive branch of our government as our candidates would have you believe, the problem lies in the legislative branch. EIGHT out of NINE council members get along with Ed Gudenas more than they get along with Bill Cervenik. This explains things stalling out despite debates continuing long and hard. This explains why we didn't just settle out of court in our case against the United States Justice Department that eventually broke our city into 8 wards. Cervenik saw the initial plan laid out by the Justice Department made sense, Gudenas and City Council did not, chose to stalemate against mediation and send it to court, where it eventually ended up costing the city, the Euclid residents, SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. This is the same city council that was still licking it's wounds after a failed recall election of Bill Cervenik showed that he indeed had the popular vote. It is obvious that these past 4 years have had no real results for Cervenik and ultimately our city because our own legislative and executive branches of local government cannot come to amicable solutions to problems, even amongst themselves. There's been a lot of activity on the blog lately, and it is nice to see that both sides have come out and shown their positions, but after seeing and reading what I have I've come to an interesting idea. Perhaps the problem isn't the mayor after all. Perhaps a big shakeup in city council is needed. Perhaps every council person should stop trying to push their own agendas and attempt to focus on the elephant in the room. Rather than backbiting and pushing each other all year only to put their hopes on the guy who doesn't even own property in the city, they should have focused on working with their current mayor, like him or not, to see that repairing an already broken city is brought to the forefront. Vote for Gudenas or Vote for Cervenik, chances are, you're not going to see a really big difference either way. 2 Comments:
Want to Post a Comment?
powered by Blogger |